A Hall of Fame Case For: Tim Raines

Tim Raines

Should Tim Raines be enshrined in the Baseball Hall of Fame? In short, yes. Below is a statistical look at how Raines compares to the Hall of Fame averages, and to some of his Hall of Fame contemporaries.

[gview file="http://www.replacementlevelpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Tim-Raines.pdf" save="1"]

Raines meets or exceeds the Hall of Fame averages for left fielders in many traditional counting numbers including runs (1571), stolen bases (808), and walks (1330). He also meets standards in OBP (.385), and slightly exceeds them in bWAR (66.2)

Just looking at Raines’ raw stolen base totals doesn’t do his baserunning justice. His stolen base percentage of 84.6% is best all time among integration era (1947-present) players with at least 400 steals. His UBR (BsR) rating on FanGraphs is 100.2, 2nd all time trailing only Rickey Henderson at 142.7. Trailing only Rickey Henderson is an unfortunate microcosm for Raines’ career.

Raines also meets the overall Hall of Fame standards in bWAR (Baseball-Reference), OBP, and wRC+.

Moving away from the averages, Raines also meets standards in C-WAR. C-WAR is a Hall of Fame monitoring system that I created using career and peak WAR. C-WAR is the career WAR(P) totals from Baseball-Reference, FanGraphs, and Baseball Prospectus added up and averaged out, plus an eight year peak (five best years in a row, plus 3 best additional years) from Baseball-Reference. Click here for more information on C-WAR.

The average C-WAR line for a Hall of Fame left fielder is 69.7 career average/44.0 peak/113.7 C-WAR. Raines meets those numbers (almost exactly), his C-WAR line looks like this: 69.1 career average/44.6 peak/113.7 C-WAR. Raines’ C-WAR of 113.7 ranks 9th all time among left fielders, topping 14 members of the Hall of Fame, and Manny Ramirez.

From 1980 (Raines’ first full season) to 1994, his WAR (Baseball-Reference) was 61.3 tying him with Ryne Sandberg for 8th best in the majors over that stretch. During that span, Raines generated more wins than several Hall of Famers including Robin Yount (59.3), Paul Molitor (58.9), Mike Schmidt (54.1), Tony Gwynn (53.2), Eddie Murray (51.4), Andre Dawson (50.5), and George Brett at 49.5. Rickey Henderson was the most valuable player during that span with a WAR of 97.3, nearly twenty more wins than Wade Boggs in 2nd place at 78.6.

Raines has some black ink on his resume too; in 1985 he led the National League in batting average (.334) and on-base percentage (.413). He also led the N.L. in runs twice (83,87) and stolen bases four consecutive years from 1981-1984. In terms of top ten finishes in his league, Raines had 4 in AVG, 7 in OBP, 7 in WAR (Position Players), 6 in OPS+, and 7 in WPA.

Over the course of his career Raines posted six seasons with a bWAR of 5 or more. Dave Winfield had five seasons, Andre Dawson and Tony Gwynn each had four.

Earlier in the piece I looked at the overall Hall of Fame averages. While those can be valuable to look at, it’s not a perfect mechanism to determine if a player is Hall-worthy. Different eras greatly skew the averages, as do some of the undeserving members at each position. Comparing Raines to Jesse Burkett doesn’t make much sense, but comparing him to people like Gwynn, Winfield, and Dawson does.

Below are the career numbers for all four of those players.

[gview file="http://www.replacementlevelpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Tim-Raines-vs-modern-outfielders.pdf" save="1"]

Gwynn’s batting average of .338 dwarfs Raines’ at .294, however the gap between the two closes when you look at OBP: Gwynn .388, Raines .385. Raines tops Gwynn in both fWAR (FanGraphs) and bWAR; he also hit more home runs, triples, walked nearly twice as much, and stole 489 more bases.

In fairness, Gwynn tops Raines in plenty of categories too. Gwynn bests Raines in wOBA, OPS+, wRC+, total bases, and extra base hits. Gwynn was also a better defensive player than Raines having saved five runs (UZR) over his career compared to Raines’ minus eleven.

Dawson was the best defensive player of the group saving 69 runs over his career. He also had the most power slugging .482 with 438 career home runs. However Raines tops Dawson in bWAR, fWAR, OPS+, wRC+, wOBA, and bested him by sixty two points in OBP (.385-.323). Raines was a better baserunner than Dawson, this we already knew, but he was also a better hitter and overall player.

Winfield had the longest career of the group, thus he ranks 1st among them in most traditional counting numbers. Winfield had a lot more power than Raines, but was also the worst defensive player of the four. Raines tops Winfield in fWAR (70.6-67.7), bWAR (66.2-59.4) and OBP (.385-.353). Raines falls just a few percentage points behind Winfield in wOBA (.361-.364). This is somewhat surprising as wOBA only measure a player’s offensive contributions, baserunning and defense are not factored into the calculation. Winfield was a better player for longer than Raines. However, Raines was better at his best — a better baserunner, defender, and a comparable hitter.

Looking at WAA (not in the charts above) you get a better look at a player’s value at his best. WAA measures how much better than league average a player is, WAR measures how much better than a replacement level player a player is. Gwynn tops the group with a WAA of 36.7. Raines is next at 35.5, followed by Dawson at 29.3, and Winfield at 24.

If I were to rank the four players, that’s the order I would do it. The point of this piece wasn’t to disparage Gwynn, Dawson, or Winfield. I think they are all deserving Hall of Famers. The point was to show Raines belongs in that group, and in the Hall of Fame as well.

One other note, because the numbers used to the compile the Hall of Fame averages are MLB stats only, it makes it impossible for me to include players who played exclusively in the Negro Leagues. Nothing has diluted stats and the integrity of the game like the exclusion of black players for over fifty years. While I can’t include them with these averages, I encourage you to visit the websites for the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum, and the National Baseball Hall of Fame to find out more about the many great players who were shamefully excluded from the game because of the color of their skin.

Many thanks to the incredibly smart people who work at Baseball-Reference, and FanGraphs, without their tireless efforts to improve and maintain their sites and information none of this research would be possible. It’s also worth noting that sometimes FanGraphs and Baseball-Reference have slightly different numbers for the same player. For example, FanGraphs has Willie Mays with 12,493 plate appearances, Baseball-Reference has him at 12,496. These slight differences are common with historical players, the differences aren’t enough to skew the averages but it’s worth mentioning that the statistics represented in the charts above were compiled using data mostly from Baseball-Reference.

Follow Ross on twitter @Rosscarey

Originally posted 12/4/12

A Hall of Fame Case For: Kenny Lofton

Kenny Lofton

Should Kenny Lofton be enshrined in the Baseball Hall of Fame? For me, the answer is yes. However Lofton finds himself on the borderline. Below is a statistical look at how he compares to the Hall of Fame averages, and to some of his Hall-worthy contemporaries.

[gview file="http://www.replacementlevelpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Kenny-Lofton.pdf" save="1"]

Lofton meets or exceeds the Hall of Fame averages for center fielders in many traditional counting numbers including hits (2428), runs (1528), stolen bases (622), and walks (945). He also meets standards in career bWAR (Baseball-Reference) but falls short in fWAR (FanGraphs). Looking at advanced metrics like OPS+, wRC+, and wOBA, Lofton falls significantly short of the Hall of Fame averages, however that’s to be expected as those numbers only measure hitting. This is in part why Lofton’s case is difficult to quantify, because so much of his value comes from his defense and baserunning.

According to UZR, Lofton saved 114.5 runs over his career–that’s 7th all time among center fielders. Lofton saved 86.4 more runs than the average of the seventeen center fielders enshrined in the Hall of Fame. The only center fielder in the Hall who saved more runs was Willie Mays at 185.

Moving away from the averages, Lofton also approaches standards in C-WAR. C-WAR is a Hall of Fame monitoring system that I created using career and peak WAR. C-WAR is the career WAR(P) totals from Baseball-Reference, FanGraphs, and Baseball Prospectus added up and averaged out, plus an eight year peak (five best years in a row, plus 3 best additional years) from Baseball-Reference. Click here for more information on C-WAR.

The average C-WAR line for a Hall of Fame center fielder is: 73.8 career average/47.1 peak/121.0 C-WAR. Those are the highest standards at any position by far. Only five center fielders enshrined in the Hall actually meet those standards. Lofton’s C-WAR line is: 62.3 AVG/45.8 PK/108.1 C-WAR. His 108.1 C-WAR is higher than nine Hall of Fame center fielders.

BP’s WARP system is unstable and frequently produces drastic changes to a player’s value. Looking at the full C-WAR chart you will notice that I included C-WAR without using BP’s WARP at all. Using just the career WAR totals from FanGraphs and Baseball-Reference, Lofton moves ahead of two more Hall of Famers, Richie Ashburn and Billy Hamilton, and ranks 9th all time among center fielders.

[caption id="attachment_1810" align="alignright" width="179"] Kenny Lofton
Courtesy of Dan Mendlik/Cleveland Indians[/caption]

From 1990-1999 Lofton produced a bWAR of 45.8, 10th best in the majors. During the decade of the 90′s, Lofton generated more value than several of his Hall-worthy contemporaries including: Mark McGwire (44.3), Roberto Alomar (43), Cal Ripken (42.3), and Mike Piazza (39.8). Lofton produced six seasons with a bWAR of 5.0 or more, including his 1994 season when he led the American League with a WAR at 7.1.

From 1975-2000, Lofton’s six seasons with a WAR of 5.0 or greater is tied with Tim Raines for 4th most by an outfielder during that span. Barry Bonds is 1st (13), Rickey Henderson is 2nd (11), Ken Griffey Jr. ranks 3rd (9). Lofton had more 5+ WAR seasons than several Hall of Fame outfielders including, Dave Winfield (5), Tony Gwynn (4) and Andre Dawson (4). Three of his Hall-worthy contemporaries, Manny Ramirez, Vladimir Guerrero, and Larry Walker each produced five seasons with a WAR of 5.0 or greater.

It’s tough to compare Lofton to modern Hall of Famers, or even to many of his contemporaries in the outfield because of the era he played in. Lofton played during a time when the home run was king. Offensive production was up for a variety of reasons, one of them being the rampant use of performance enhancing drugs throughout the sport. How much steroids increased value is unclear, but they certainly had an impact. When the league was hitting home runs at a record rate, Lofton was creating runs in very different ways.

Lofton also has some black ink on his Hall of Fame resume; in addition to leading the Majors in WAR (7.1) and hits (160) in 1994, Lofton also led the American League in stolen bases five consecutive seasons from 1992-1996. Using the defensive metrics at Baseball-Reference, Lofton led center fielders in runs saved three times and finished top five an additional five times.

Earlier in the piece I looked at the overall Hall of Fame averages. While those can be valuable to look at, it’s not a perfect mechanism to determine if a player is Hall-worthy. Different eras greatly skew the averages, as do some of the undeserving members at each position. Comparing Lofton to Billy Hamilton doesn’t make much sense, but comparing him to someone like Ryne Sandberg does.

Because so much of Lofton’s value came from fielding and baserunning, it was more difficult to find player’s to compare him to. I settled on Sandberg, Tim Raines, and Richie Ashburn. Ashburn played from 1948-1962, yet he and Lofton had very similar careers. Sandberg and Ashburn are members of the baseball Hall of Fame, Raines should be in, but isn’t yet. My HOF case for him can be found here.

[gview file="http://www.replacementlevelpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Kenny-Lofton-vs-modern-players.pdf"]

Although Lofton and Sandberg played different positions, they were actually very similar players. Their bWAR is identical (64.9). Sandberg had more power (.452 SLG) than Lofton (.423), but Lofton was a better defender and baserunner who also topped Sandberg by 28 points in OBP (.372-.344). Lofton’s wOBA of .352 is just a tick higher than Sandberg’s at .351. Lofton created more runs(1303-1285), but Sandberg has a higher wRC+ (114-110).

Lofton was not the hitter that Raines was, but was a much better defender saving 114.5 runs (UZR) over his career, compared to Raines’ -11.2 . Both were great baserunners, however Raines stole more bases and did so more efficiently with his 84.6% success rate. Lofton’s success rate was still an impressive 79.5%

Ashburn got on base a lot (.396 OBP) and was and excellent defender who, like Lofton, played in the shadows of some of the biggest stars in the history of the game. Despite Ashburn’s paltry home run total (29), he and Lofton posted very similar numbers and career value. Ashburn was eventually elected to the Hall of Fame by the Veterans Committee, and I suspect Lofton will travel a similar path.

Looking at WAA (not in the charts above) you get a better look at a player’s value at his best. WAA measures how much better than league average a player is, while WAR measures how much better than a replacement level player a player is. Lofton and Sandberg are tied at top with a WAA of 38.4. Raines is next at 35.5, followed by Ashburn at 28.2

Of the seventeen center fielders enshrined in the Hall because of their MLB playing careers, eleven started their career prior to 1945, eight of them began before 1925. Modern center fielders are under represented in the Hall of Fame. Balancing out some of the discrepancies in eras represented is valuable when possible, it would more accurately reflect the great players from all generations which is what the Hall of Fame is supposed to do. For me, this helps Lofton’s cause.

Since Lofton’s retirement, the BBWAA has since discredited (perhaps unfairly) most of the home run hitters who played in the 90′s and early 2000′s. One would think with power being devalued, Hall of Fame voters would put more weight on defense and speed, and turn their attention to players like Lofton. 2013 will be Lofton’s first year on the Hall of Fame ballot, and unfortunately, likely his last.

One other note, because the numbers used to the compile the Hall of Fame averages are MLB stats only, it makes it impossible for me to include players who played exclusively in the Negro Leagues. Nothing has diluted stats and the integrity of the game like the exclusion of black players for over fifty years. While I can’t include them with these averages, I encourage you to visit the websites for the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum, and the National Baseball Hall of Fame to find out more about the many great players who were shamefully excluded from the game because of the color of their skin.

Many thanks to the incredibly smart people who work at Baseball-Reference, and FanGraphs, without their tireless efforts to improve and maintain their sites and information none of this research would be possible. It’s also worth noting that sometimes FanGraphs and Baseball-Reference have slightly different numbers for the same player. For example, FanGraphs has Willie Mays with 12,493 plate appearances, Baseball-Reference has him at 12,496. These slight differences are common with historical players, the differences aren’t enough to skew the averages but it’s worth mentioning that the statistics represented in the charts above were compiled using data mostly from Baseball-Reference.

Follow me on twitter @Rosscarey

Images used courtesy of Dan Mendlik/Cleveland Indians

Originally posted 11/14/12

Updated 12/12/12

 

 

 

 

 

A Hall of Fame Case For: Alan Trammell

Alan Trammell

Should Alan Trammell be enshrined in the Baseball Hall of Fame? In short, yes. Below is a statistical look at how he compares to Hall of Fame averages both as his position and overall.

[gview file="http://www.replacementlevelpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Alan-Trammell3.pdf" save="1"]

The chart starts with the averages of the 22 shortstops already enshrined in the Hall of Fame. This group represents the 22 players who were elected as players only, and were enshrined because of their MLB playing careers. The averages include Ernie Banks’ numbers, Banks ended up playing more games at first than short however seven of his eight peak seasons were played primarily at shortstop.

An interesting note about this group of 22, 16 of them started their careers before 1945. 10 of those players, started before 1925. Modern shortstops are under represented in the Hall of Fame, that’s one of the reasons I think Trammell is deserving.

Next on the chart are a look at Trammell’s career numbers.

Trammell exceeds the Hall of Fame standard in bWAR (Baseball-Reference) and meets them in fWAR (FanGraphs). He also exceeds standards in OPS+ and wRC+. Trammell’s numbers as a whole are remarkably similar to the Hall of Fame averages across the board.

Next on the chart are the averages for every position player enshrined in the Hall of Fame. Again, this group of players are the Hall of Famers who were elected as players only, for their MLB career.

Trammell’s career bWAR of 67.1 exceeds the overall Hall of Fame standard of 63.2. Trammell’s traditional counting numbers fall short, however most middle infielders fall short statistically when they are compared to first basemen and outfielders.

The last set of numbers on the chart above are the Hall of Fame averages for players who started their career from 1945-present. I like looking at these numbers more than the overall averages because of how much the game has changed over the past 140 years. Comparing Trammell (or any modern player) to the players who played in a segregated league when the game was still developing, isn’t ideal.

In addition to the numbers listed above, Trammell also exceeds standards in C-WAR. C-WAR is a Hall of Fame monitoring system I created using career and peak WAR. C-WAR is the career WAR(P) totals from Baseball-Reference, FanGraphs, and Baseball Prospectus added up and averaged out, plus an eight year peak (five best years in a row, plus 3 best additional years) from Baseball-Reference. Click here for more information on C-WAR.

The average C-WAR line for a Hall of Fame shortstop is: 64.9 career average/43.4 peak/108.3 C-WAR. Trammell’s line looks like this 63.4 career average/46.7 peak/110.1 C-WAR. Trammel’s 110.1 C-WAR is a higher number posted by ten shortstops enshrined in the Hall, including Pee Wee Reese, and Joe Tinker.

Trammell’s OPS+ (110) and wRC+ (111) come close to the numbers Robin Yount posted (115) and (114), however according to UZR, Trammell bested Yount by 123 runs saved over their careers.

[caption id="attachment_1699" align="alignright" width="380"] Alan Trammell and Lou Whitaker-1978
courtesy of the Detroit Tigers[/caption]

Trammell is tied for 11th (with Larkin) in career bWAR for shortstops, ahead of Hall of Famers that include Wallace, Reese, and Cronin. From 1980-1989 Trammell’s bWAR of 50.7 ranked 5th in all of baseball, second among shortstops to Robin Yount at 53.2. Trammell’s 50.7 WAR during the 80′s topped Hall of Famers Ozzie Smith (49.9), Cal Ripken (48.3), George Brett (45.8), and Andre Dawson (45.0).

Trammell had six seasons with a bWAR of 5 or more, that includes 1987 when he posted a WAR of 8. He also had six full seasons with an OPS+ of 120 or higher, to put that number in perspective that ties him with Cal Ripken. Barry Larkin had five, Yount had four (at short).

I understand that looking at the overall Hall of Fame averages isn’t a perfect mechanism. Different eras greatly skew the averages, as do some of the undeserving members at each position. Comparing Trammell to Bobby Wallace doesn’t make much sense, but comparing him to Yount, Larkin, and Ozzie Smith does. Below is a look at how Trammell’s career numbers match up against those three.

[gview file="http://www.replacementlevelpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Trammell-vs-modern-shortstops3.pdf" save="1"]

They all have similar career value, yet all three were very different players. Yount played half of his career in the outfield, Smith was the best defensive shortstop ever to play but a below average hitter, and Larkin battled injuries throughout his career.

For me the interesting comparison here is with Ozzie Smith. Trammell was not the defender that Smith was, however he crushes Smith in every offensive category. Their career WAR numbers are almost identical and so is their peak value. Smith got elected his first year on the ballot with over 90% of the vote, Trammell is still languishing on the ballot having yet to receive even half of the 75% needed for election.

Trammell may not have been the best shortstop ever to play, but that’s not what the Hall of Fame is. His traditional counting numbers (hits, HR, XBH, TB) meet or exceed Hall of Fame standards, and new metrics like WAR help to paint a more accurate picture of his true value.

Trammell was a better player than at least seven shortstops enshrined in the Hall of Fame. He did lots of things very well, but never dominated in any one particular area. That’s one of the text book ways a player, even a Hall of Fame caliber player, can spend his entire career being underrated or undervalued. He played in the shadows of his Hall of Fame contemporaries Ripken, Yount, and Smith. He may not have been as good as Ripken or Yount, but he deserves his do and should be enshrined.

One other note, because the numbers used to the compile the Hall of Fame averages are MLB stats only, it makes it impossible for me to include players who played exclusively in the Negro Leagues. Nothing has diluted stats and the integrity of the game like the exclusion of black players for over fifty years. While I can’t include them with these averages, I encourage you to visit the websites for the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum, and the National Baseball Hall of Fame to find out more about the many great players who were shamefully excluded from the game because of the color of their skin.

Many thanks to the incredibly smart people who work at Baseball-Reference, and FanGraphs, without their tireless efforts to improve and maintain their sites and information none of this research would be possible. It’s also worth noting that sometimes FanGraphs and Baseball-Reference have slightly different numbers for the same player. For example, FanGraphs has Willie Mays with 12,493 plate appearances, Baseball-Reference has him at 12,496. These slight differences are common with historical players, the differences aren’t enough to skew the averages but it’s worth mentioning that the statistics represented in the chart above were compiled using data mostly from Baseball-Reference.

Follow Ross on twitter @Rosscarey

Images used courtesy of the Detroit Tigers

Originally posted 11/13/12

A Hall of Fame Case For: Lou Whitaker

Lou Whitaker

Should Lou Whitaker be enshrined in the Baseball Hall of Fame? In short, yes. Below is a statistical look at how he compares to Hall of Fame averages, and to some of his HOF contemporaries.

[gview file="http://www.replacementlevelpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Lou-Whitaker5.pdf" save="1"]

The chart starts with the averages of the 19 second basemen already enshrined in the Hall of Fame. This group represents the 19 players who were elected as players only, and were enshrined because of their MLB playing careers, and it includes Rod Carew. Carew ended up playing more games at first than second base however five of his eight peak seasons were played at second, so I’ve included his numbers with these averages.

An interesting note about this group of 19, 11 of them started their careers before 1945. 7 of those players  started before 1925. Modern second basemen are under represented in the Hall of Fame, that’s one of the reasons I think Whitaker is deserving.

Next on the chart are a look at Whitaker’s career numbers.

Whitaker exceeds the Hall of Fame standard in bWAR (Baseball-Reference) and meets them in fWAR (FanGraphs). He also exceeds standards in UZR, having saved 77 runs over his career, 8.5 more than the Hall of Fame average. Whitaker also comes very close to the standards in OPS+ and wRC+, and just about all of his counting numbers land above the averages.

[caption id="attachment_1581" align="alignright" width="237"] Lou Whitaker
courtesy of the Detroit Tigers[/caption]

Next on the chart are the averages for every position player enshrined in the Hall of Fame. Again, this group of players are the Hall of Famers who were elected as players only, for their MLB career.

Whitaker exceeds the overall Hall averages in bWAR, fWAR, and UZR. His wRC+, and OPS+  fall short however with numbers like that it’s more important to compare him against the standards at second base. No one expects a player like Whitaker (or any second basemen for that matter) to put up the offensive numbers of the Hall of Famers who played first base or in the outfield.

The last set of numbers on the chart above are the Hall of Fame averages for players who started their career from 1945-present. I like looking at these numbers more than the overall averages because of how much the game has changed over the past 140 years. Comparing Whitaker (or any modern player) to the players who played in a segregated league when the game was still developing, doesn’t make a ton of sense.

Whitaker approaches the modern standards in both bWAR & fWAR, and meets them in OBP.

In addition to the numbers listed above, Whitaker also comes very close to the standards in C-WAR. C-WAR is a Hall of Fame monitoring system I created using career and peak WAR. C-WAR is the career WAR(P) totals from Baseball-Reference, FanGraphs, and Baseball Prospectus added up and averaged out, plus an eight year peak (five best years in a row, plus 3 best additional years) from Baseball-Reference. Click here for more information on C-WAR.

The average C-WAR line for a Hall of Fame second baseman is: 70.1 career average/47.1 peak/117.1 C-WAR. C-WAR. Whitaker’s line looks like this 67.3 career average/40.6 peak/107.9 C-WAR. Whitaker’s 107.9 C-WAR is a greater number posted by nine second basemen enshrined in the Hall, including Roberto Alomar who is at 106.8.

Whitaker’s OPS+ (117) and wRC+ (117) are also nearly identical to Alomar’s 116 and 118. According to UZR, Whitaker bested Alomar by 87 runs saved over their careers. I’m not trying to make a case against Alomar, I think he’s deserving and would have voted for him, but it’s strange to see how narrative for two similar players doesn’t quite match up to what their statistics actually represent.

Although Whitaker falls slightly below C-WAR standards, this is where I give him the benefit of the doubt because of the position he played. When it comes to the Hall second base in a mess. The position is flooded with segregation era players and the standards for enshrinement are the most inconsistent. Whitaker ranks 6th in career bWAR for second basemen, ahead of Hall of Famers that include Frisch, Gordon, Sandberg, and Alomar. From 1980-1989 Whitaker’s bWAR of 41.6 ranked 14th in all of baseball, first among second basemen.

Whitaker had four seasons with a bWAR of 5 or more, but none above 7. Whitaker was never dominant, never the best player in the game, but he was consistently very good for well over a decade. He had six full seasons with an OPS+ of 120 or higher, to put that number in perspective that ties him with Ryne Sandberg. Roberto Alomar and Craig Biggio each had five.

Speaking of Sandberg, Alomar, and Biggio below is a chart for how Whitaker’s career numbers match up with those guys. I wanted to include a chart like this because I understand that looking at the overall Hall of Fame averages isn’t a perfect mechanism. Different eras greatly skew the averages, as do some of the undeserving members at each position. Comparing Whitaker to Nap Lajoie doesn’t make much sense, but comparing him to Sandberg, Alomar, and Biggio does.

[gview file="http://www.replacementlevelpodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Whitaker-vs-modern-2B4.pdf" save="1"]

Whitaker tops the group in both bWAR & fWAR. He was the best defensive player of the four saving 77 runs over his career, and has the highest OPS+ at 117. Adding Whitaker’s OPS+ and wRC+ together (new stat!) you get 234, tying Roberto Alomar with the highest number of the group. I think all four are deserving of enshrinement, their numbers are very similar. Sandberg and Alomar are in, Biggio appears on the ballot for the first time in 2013. Whitaker somehow fell off the ballot his first year on it receiving 2.9% of the vote. 75% is needed for admission, something went wrong there.

Whitaker may not have been the best second basemen ever to play, but that’s not what the Hall of Fame is. His traditional counting numbers (RBI, hits, runs, XBH, TB) meet or exceed Hall of Fame standards, and new metrics like WAR help to paint a more accurate picture of his true value.

Whitaker was a better player than at least seven second basemen enshrined in the Hall of Fame and including him would help balance out some of the discrepancies in eras represented, and with the inconsistent admission standards at the position. It’s important that the Hall of Fame represents each era evenly, or as close to even as possible. Some positions do that better than others, second base needs a lot of help, Whitaker is part of the solution.

One other note, because the numbers used to the compile the Hall of Fame averages are MLB stats only, it makes it impossible for me to include players who played exclusively in the Negro Leagues. Nothing has diluted stats and the integrity of the game like the exclusion of black players for over fifty years. While I can’t include them with these averages, I encourage you to visit the websites for the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum, and the National Baseball Hall of Fame to find out more about the many great players who were shamefully excluded from the game because of the color of their skin.

Many thanks to the incredibly smart people who work at Baseball-Reference, and FanGraphs, without their tireless efforts to improve and maintain their sites and information none of this research would be possible. It’s also worth noting that sometimes FanGraphs and Baseball-Reference have slightly different numbers for the same player. For example, FanGraphs has Willie Mays with 12,493 plate appearances, Baseball-Reference has him at 12,496. These slight differences are common with historical players, the differences aren’t enough to skew the averages but it’s worth mentioning that the statistics represented in the chart above were compiled using data mostly from Baseball-Reference.

Follow Ross on twitter @Rosscarey

Images used courtesy of the Detroit Tigers

Originally posted 11/13/12